|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Abagah Khan
Shinigami Miners
ChaosTheory.
3
   |
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:35:36 -
[1] - Quote
So rather than address the obvious issues of incursions, you yet again massively weaken capitals in pvp. People who train and invest ~30bn in a ship should be able to make more isk than someone ratting afk in a vni.
If you really want to reduce isk availability, hammer on incursions and reduce overall bounty availability. Rather than yet again going full hammer on anyone who trained into a capital |
Abagah Khan
Shinigami Miners
ChaosTheory.
4
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:59:08 -
[2] - Quote
Krypleria wrote:OK CCP, let me get this straight ...
VNI ratting = 12-15m/tick (ship cost 40m)
Ishtar ratting = 20-25m/tick (ship cost 300m)
Carrier tick = 40-60m/tick (ship cost 2.5b)
Super tick = 80-100m/tick (ship cost 25-30b)
Seems balanced to me.
Do you guys even play this game ? =/
You will lose so many players because of this... it will hurt the economy of CCP ... not the game =/
Can you think of OTHER solutions to the economy problem ?
what kind of poor is using a carrier that is only 2.5bn fit.... |
Abagah Khan
Shinigami Miners
ChaosTheory.
4
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 11:00:20 -
[3] - Quote
Rovinia wrote:Nobody likes to see his toy nerfed, but as it seems this was really an issue. So thanks for tackling it, even if it's surely a unpopular move.
Wouldn't a combination of applicaton nerf and a change in the NPC spawns in these sites (some more smaller ships the carrier has longer to chew on) have been better then this damage reduction? It put's the carrier in a difficult position PvP wise.
but this wasnt an issue.. Risk vs reward and how long it takes to train. its just another nerf trying to limit goons that will hit everyone |
Abagah Khan
Shinigami Miners
ChaosTheory.
6
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 13:18:23 -
[4] - Quote
Quote:If you go one step further and assess what the actual big picture problem is...there is no counter to the faucet. You need a sink to drain it. There is nothing wrong with having wealth, when there is something to spend it on. Right now there is no sink, no overflow tank, no sump pump nor levy to stop the flood. Reducing slightly ( and we are talking slightly) the amount of isk incoming, will still not resolve the issue of too much personal wealth.
Personal, Corproate and Alliance Income tax, asset repossession, removal of insurance payouts, would all be a big step in resolving the personal wealth. Bans of tax evaders, wallet negative adjusting, and forensic accounting could all be used to slow down and control the massive unflux of risk free and risk adverse income streams.
this is something ive noticed myself lately. Outside of skins, there is nothing to sink isk into. So i put it in anotehr ship.. or in this case the market, making even more isk that i have nothing to spend it on.. |
|
|
| |
|